The advantages of overlapping hours of work in hiring teleengineers?
The practice of offshoring is a particularly precarious one in the software development sector. One in three project owners shares horror stories about how their offshore partners’ faults seriously hampered the development of their products. The success of the offshore crew depends entirely on how well they manage their understanding of working for a U.S. company venture.
When done correctly, offshore deployment improves your bottom line by cutting costs and, more crucially, giving you access to a talent pool that is not otherwise available. When these two qualities are combined, a product can scale more quickly, allowing for more frequent releases of product updates.
Working with a scattered offshore workforce requires adjusting to various time zones and locations. The European and Asian continents are the preferred places for offshore projects for American clients. If the remote team is located in Asia, the time difference is almost 12–13 hours, compared to near-shore development centers in Europe, which offer a time difference of 3–4 hours at best. When it’s 10 AM here and 10 PM there, do you make your offshore staff productive?
The Value of Real-Time Collaboration:
Offshoring consultants have tested working arrangements in several time zones throughout the years. The efficiency of real-time collaboration, however, cannot be matched by static communication, such as overnight email exchanges. There is just so much time available to coordinate over project discussion while managing your remote teams with a 1-2 hour overlap.
It’s crucial to think about how managing a remote worker in a different time zone fits into the dynamics of your team. Meeting with them once a day or even once a week would make sense if the resource has a strategic focus, such as guiding the architectural design of your application or charting the course for your upcoming marketing campaign. However, if you are utilizing more transactional resources, such as middle-level developers who are
Creating code together to ensure that your onsite project team stays on track with the current development sprint while you must stay in constant contact with them. Questions can come up at any time, and even a small detour from the planned course can eventually cost the offshore developer three to four hours of work if they do not receive the necessary reorientation right afterward.
Let’s say your offshore crew has a 4-hour overlap when operating, At the start of the four hours, you have a scrum meeting to go over the plans. After you sign off, you have another scrum meeting to go through the day’s successes. What transpires, though, if the developer runs into trouble or has inquiries during their remaining working hours? They will divert from their intended activities at that period, forcing them to restart where you left off and costing you the time you had left to work by being ineffective.
Utilizing a Work Hours Overlap for Cost Control and Scalability:
Offshoring engagements frequently fail because of the additional work needed to make up for inefficiencies brought on by job deviations. After first giving you an estimate of 2,000 hours of work, your offshore partner ultimately charges you for 3,000 hours of work. Your projected cost reduction from outsourcing of between 25 and 30 percent is ultimately lost due to the extra hours.
Engaging offshore teams that can offer the greatest amount of working hour overlap is the best strategy to combat communication barriers while collaborating with people in various time zones. The working time overlap should ideally make up at least 80% of the shift length. Additionally, your onsite project manager needs to be able to spot veers and get the offshore resource back on track.
You can better incorporate the scattered team members into your organization’s culture by having your onsite and offshore teams work during the same hours. It’s not just about having that 15-minute meeting if you work in a startup environment. You have the chance to communicate with your worldwide team in real-time while doing anything from debating the implications of recent technological advancements to laughing together over the newest memes. Strong working relationships are nourished and your startup culture is improved through this type of contact.
We have shown that collaborating with your distributed teams in real time can help you avoid several remote recruiting traps, such as deviating from product development objectives and the ensuing wasteful work hours. Additionally, overlapping work hours promote better communication between your on-site and offshore personnel. But how can you ensure that your overseas resources quickly grasp American business culture without sacrificing productivity?
Lack of cultural awareness is one of the main causes of offshore teams’ failure. It can be challenging to combine remote workers from various cultural and geographic backgrounds. No matter how skilled your offshore engineers are technical, they won’t be useful if they can’t comprehend and adapt to American business customs, leading to a cultural divide between your onsite and offshore teams.
Having an onshore team relations expert who is skilled at communicating with people from various cultural backgrounds is the greatest method to bridge this cultural divide. The ideal candidate for this position would be an American client relations liaison working on behalf of the service provider, whose job it is to ensure that the offshore team fully comprehends your needs. Your offshoring agreement will be successful in the long run if you use a hybrid offshore staffing model like this one with an onshore contact person.
